The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year before and year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the number of visitors before and after the modernization of the Ashdown museum and the pie charts following the table shows level of satisfaction among visitors in Ashdown Museum during the same two given periods.
Refurbishment seems to have a positive impact among the visitors with significant increase of visitors from 74000 before the reconstruction to 92000 after it had been done. Now looking at the charts, the major decline from 40 to 15 percent was noticed among the respondents expressing dissatisfaction while very dissatisfied decreased by 5 percent after the refurbishment. In contrast, the positive change of 20 percent and 10 percent was seen in the response of very satisfied and satisfied among the visitors respectively. However, the individuals with no response remained static in the given periods.
Overall, the total number of visitors after new management exceeded the visitors before, reflecting the positive impact of refurbishment in the museum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51948051948 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12528629149 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3620604285 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323723310966 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153311736008 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132406432888 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244406476254 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133814817765 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.