The multi line graph depicts the remarkable information about the delivery of wheat in three regions between 1985 to 1990. The data has been calibrated in millions of tonnes.
Having a myopic look, it can be clearly seen that in 1987 near by 15 millions of tonnes wheat transported to Australia, whereas in 1990 this amount of exported wheat diminished (11 millions of tonnes). Furthermore, approximately 20 millions of tonnes wheat sent to Canada in 1985, however it reached at peak level with 25 millions of tonnes in 1988.
Further scrutinizing the graph, in European community, around 16 millions of tonnes wheat transported and in next year this amount of wheat for export increased slightly between 1986 and 1987. Moving further, in 1988, 13 millions of tonnes wheat imported by Australia, whilst in last two years this amount of wheat for transport remained constant with 11 millions of tonnes.
Thus, from the overall analysis of the graph, it is evident that the mammoth amount of wheat imported by Canada, nevertheless very least amount was exported to Australia in last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...ok, it can be clearly seen that in 1987 near by 15 millions of tonnes wheat transported...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...an be clearly seen that in 1987 near by 15 millions of tonnes wheat transported to Australia, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '11 million'.
Suggestion: 11 million
...his amount of exported wheat diminished 11 millions of tonnes. Furthermore, approximately 20 m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...s of tonnes. Furthermore, approximately 20 millions of tonnes wheat sent to Canada in 1985, ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '25 million'.
Suggestion: 25 million
..., however it reached at peak level with 25 millions of tonnes in 1988. Further scrutinizing t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...el with 25 millions of tonnes in 1988. Further scrutinizing the graph, in European com...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '16 million'.
Suggestion: 16 million
...he graph, in European community, around 16 millions of tonnes wheat transported and in next ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '13 million'.
Suggestion: 13 million
...1986 and 1987. Moving further, in 1988, 13 millions of tonnes wheat imported by Australia, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '11 million'.
Suggestion: 11 million
...at for transport remained constant with 11 millions of tonnes. Thus, from the overall analysi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, nevertheless, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04444444444 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66664351842 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8725957183 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121620423598 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668520395255 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428668117488 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851647055934 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227520062782 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.