The map below shows the development of Chorleywood in the period 1868-1994.

The map describes the significant alterations of a village named Chorleywood during the time period of 1886 to 1994.
Zooming in detail,in the Chorleywood of 1886 to 1883 there was only a park and golf course facility available for people, while in next one decade a Chorleywood station built alongside the park. Moving further,in 1970 a motorway was constructed passing across the railway path and main roads.
Furthermore,in a period of 48 years (1922-1970), main roads were provided to village people, whilst it's 13 years ago(1909), merely a railway facility was given to Chorleywood villagers.
Thus,from the overall investigation of the map,it is evident that in ancient time there were few development in village and it took more than a century to develop well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...riod of 1886 to 1994. Zooming in detail,in the Chorleywood of 1886 to 1883 there w...
^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...built alongside the park. Moving further,in 1970 a motorway was constructed passing...
^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ailway path and main roads. Furthermore,in a period of 48 years 1922-1970, main ro...
^^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...as given to Chorleywood villagers. Thus,from the overall investigation of the map,it...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...rom the overall investigation of the map,it is evident that in ancient time there w...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, thus, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 643.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 124.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18548387097 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93844011015 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653225806452 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8914238318 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202529315516 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108237895826 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870965914484 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131272209098 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798487059128 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.