The graph below shows the four leading types of farming produce in Mitchford city between 1970 2000 Summarize the following information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph presents how four leading types of farming produce in Mitch ford city over a period of 1970-2000.

Firstly, In 1970 wheat was highest types of farming products which produced almost 45 thousand dollar in Mitch ford city and lowest products was cotton which has been stabilized for ten years. Others two product corn and sugar were 30 thousand and 20 thousand respectively.

Secondly, after ten years according to the line graph in 1980 cotton has reached his peak position. It's about 90 thousand dollar and remained until 1980. In terms of sugar it is also increased gradually almost 35 thousand. In case of wheat and corn those products raised slowly too.

Finally, between 1990 to 2000 cotton has been dropped sharply and became came down into 1970 dollar rate. But sugar were still increased and matched with wheat at 45 thousand almost. The corn also fell minimally.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (5 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...of 1970-2000. Firstly, In 1970 wheat was highest types of farming products which produce...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...0 cotton has reached his peak position. Its about 90 thousand dollar and remained u...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25842619735 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646666666667 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3699185744 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139692124491 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518371478831 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912028801211 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113850913628 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111403312168 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.