The table below shows the average annual percentages of water pollution I four large cities in 2003 Summarize the following information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The table reveals the water pollution in four big cities by major pollutants of yearly average percentage in 2003.

According to table most cities polluted by domestic sewage. Sao Paulo is the highest polluted city by their own domestic sewage, it is about 65%. Tokyo was the lowest polluted city which was 23% only and other two cities are almost middle percentages. IN case of by pesticides pollution. Tokyo city was most pollute place 31% and lowest was Sao Paulo 9%. In term of polluted by erosion and phosphates in detergents New York is the highest place almost 56% and lowest city was Taipei.
Tokyo was second highest polluted city by those type of pollution. It is about 46% in total and second lowest city was Sao Paulo.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (10 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pesticides'' or 'pesticide's'?
Suggestion: pesticides'; pesticide's
...lmost middle percentages. IN case of by pesticides pollution. Tokyo city was most pollute ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 607.0 965.302439024 63% => OK
No of words: 128.0 196.424390244 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7421875 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.36358566101 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34373697913 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 68.0 106.607317073 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4644027203 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.4444444444 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.2222222222 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179328894635 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952650263989 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924768336111 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174726008178 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116675728949 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.