The table below shows the average annual percentages of water pollution I four large cities in 2003. Summarize the following information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the average annual percentages of water pollution I four large cities in 2003. Summarize the following information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A glance at provided table reveals four principal contributors which cause water pollution in four distinctive cities namely, New York, Tai Pei, Sao Polo and Tokyo. Data is concerning annual statistics in 2003 and domestic sewage, erosion, phosphates in detergents and pesticides were taken as contributors.

It is apparent from the information supplied that domestic sewage resulted in the highest rates of water pollution in Sao Polo where 65% of pollution caused by this factor. Remaining cities Tai Pei, Tokyo and New York suffered from this factor by 50%, 23% and 41 % respectively.

Takin...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: While Tokyo 23 was going through higher water pollution problems owing to erosion than other cities, it was phosphates in detergents for New York accounting for 34 of total pollution.
Description: The token was is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to was and phosphates

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 203 200
No. of Characters: 1045 1000
No. of Different Words: 109 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.775 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.148 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.847 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 56 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.094 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.471 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.762 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4