The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the data about the favorite recreational pursuits of children in two nations in 2007. Overall, the young Australians were more likely to do outdoor activities, whereas the New Zealander children were more involved in indoor activities.
For Australian youths, most of them enjoyed doing sporting activities, which accounted for approximately 28%. Besides that, the second highest proportion of 25% children enjoyed visiting parks. The third most popular activity were watching video games and playing computer games, which both attracted 15%. The least popular activity were reading, and art and crafts, which accounted for 10% and 7% respectively.
Turning to the young New Zealanders, the highest rate was art and crafts, which accounted for 25%. The same proportion of 17% of children liked reading and watching video games. The third most common activity was playing computer games, which attracted only 15%. The same percentage of young New Zealanders were interested in visiting parks and doing sports, they were the lowest percentage at about 13%.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and watching video games. The third most common activity was playing computer gam...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mputer games, which attracted only 15%. The same percentage of young New Zealanders...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48502994012 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66660092907 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2306095283 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168789786138 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684447889689 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308011134515 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123738599014 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177061232889 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.