The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph compares the proportion of the teacher’s recruitment according to the graduation year in Ontario during the period between 2001 and 2007. during this time period these proportions in two adverse direction.

between 2001 and 2002, both the percentage of english-language teachers and french-language teachers fell slightly,from about 70% to under 60%. after that, the figure for french language recruited teachers recovered and peaked at just under 70%, while the percentage of english teachers continued to fall to 40% in 2003.

In the next five years , there was an upward fluctuation in the percentage of french-language teachers. it reached a peak at around 75% in the 2007. On the other hand, after dropping to 40% in 2003, the figure of french teachers increased marginally and went up to around 45%.Then, over the period between 2005 and 2007, it plunged from 45% to under 30%.

In conclusion, although in the beginning point the proportion of english teachers and french teacher was quite equal to each other, there was a clearly disproportion between these proportion in the final year of this time period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-04 quynhhtrangg2512 73 view
2019-09-04 quynhhtrangg2512 73 view
2019-09-04 quynhhtrangg2512 78 view
2019-04-15 Mandy3456 56 view
2019-04-09 Littlebinbin 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uitment according to the graduation year in Ontario during the period between 200...
^^
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...uring the period between 2001 and 2007. during this time period these proportions in t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Between
...roportions in two adverse direction. between 2001 and 2002, both the percentage of e...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...d french-language teachers fell slightly,from about 70% to under 60%. after that, the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...l slightly,from about 70% to under 60%. after that, the figure for french language re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 40% in 2003. In the next five years , there was an upward fluctuation in the ...
^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...percentage of french-language teachers. it reached a peak at around 75% in the 200...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the figure of french teachers increased marginally and went up to around 45%.The...
^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...d marginally and went up to around 45%.Then, over the period between 2005 and 2007,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('clearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('disproportion') instead of another adjective.
...as quite equal to each other, there was a clearly disproportion between these proportion in the final y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25274725275 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02485547827 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8942474705 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153422962303 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754421545611 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717748748224 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991019716359 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397060211181 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.