The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of two types of teachers who get teaching job on the first time from 2001 to 2007 in Ontario.
In the first three years between 2001 and 2003, the job for English-language teachers declined dramatically from 73 percent to 40 percent. French-language teachers, meanwhile, got less job as well from 70 percent in 2001 to 53 percent in 2003.
Between 2003 and 2005, teachers for both of languages had relatively stable job. That were around 70 percent for French teachers and about 43 percent for English teachers.
There was a remarkable difference from 2005 to 2007 in the percentage of first-year teachers. Regarding French teachers, there was a slight rise in percentage of people who got the job from 70 percent to 75 percent. In contrast, the percentage of English teachers fell sharply from 43 percent to below 30 percent.
Overall, French teachers and English teachers each group had a stable job in period three years from 2003 to 2005. But after that, the percentage of people who taught French language tend to go up slowly, while English-language teachers dipped significantly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06951871658 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94962326214 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9916650126 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099350580043 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05429287084 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377343320327 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751668577486 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378263753687 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.