The graph below shows information about the total oil consumption of four major consumers from 2009 to 2030.
The line graph illustrates the use of oil in total of different consumers in the USA, China, Middle East, Western Europe and Japan between 2009 and 2030. Units are measured in million barrels.
Overall, it is clear that oil consumption in the USA, China, Western Europe and Japan will experience a downward trend over the period show, whereas the opposite will be true for the remaining country.
In 2009, the total oil usage in the USA was the highest, at approximately 9 million barrels, while the amount of oil that was used in Western Europe and Japan, China, Middle East were much lower, at 4 and 2 million barrels respectively. Later on that time, oil consumption in America and China slightly increased until the former reached its peak at 10 million barrels in 2015 and a projection of 4 million barrels in 2025 for the latter. However, the USA will drop from 10 to 8 million barrels in the next 10 years and remain steady in the last period, meanwhile, China will have a small decline to about 3.5 million barrels in 2030.
A similar trend was seen in the Middle East, which had a steady growth and is predicted to rise to 3 million barrels in 2030. In contrast, the daily numbers of barrels used by Western Europe & Japan were halved throughout the first 6 years and are projected to continue to go down to around 2 million in the last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...en 2009 and 2030. Units are measured in million barrels. Overall, it is clear that oil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57201646091 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44178044112 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1806185512 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.875 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.375 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155755545085 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733979283046 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704428890565 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107987870093 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676537401225 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.