The graph below shows the macronutrient intake of Australians in term of kilocalories per day per person from 1909 to 2006.
The given line graph depicts the amount of carbohydrate, fat, and protein consumed by Australians over 97 years. Macronutrient consumption is measured in kilocalories.
Overall, it can be seen that carbohydrate was the most consumed macronutrient, followed by fat and then protein. The amount of carbohydrate fell slightly before increasing again, while the amount of fat had a gradual rise over the years. Protein consumption remained steady.
In 1909, the amount of carbohydrate consumption was 1400 kcal per day. While it experienced a constant fluctuation from 1929 to 1969, carbohydrate started to rise again to reach a peak in the late 1990s. By 2006, carbohydrate intake per person amounted to 1300 kcal per day. In contrast, fat followed a more linear trend over a 97-year period. There were continual fluctuations; however, the intake of fat eaten by Australians rose from below 800 kcal per day to approximately 950 kcal per day in 1909, and 1999 respectively. Comparatively, the protein was the most stable trend and barely changed over the period of 97 years. It started at just below 300 kcal per day and ended up at almost above 300 kcal per day. There was only one deviation in 1949, which lasted for several years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04411764706 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01863286399 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2592071938 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1538461538 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287557176003 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100082529383 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132753986116 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144715788634 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141227569819 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.