The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph elucidated that the comparison the number of books which it had read between men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. Overall, since 2011 to 2013, the number of books which it were read by men and women tend to increase noticeably. however, in 2014 while the number of books read of women lean to uplift significantly which it added more or less than 4000 books, albeit the number of books read of men gravitate to slump extremely, which it reached more or less than 4000 books.
Furthermore, the uppermost number of books read in 2011 was held by male, which it gained 4000 books, and the undermost is women which it moderately reached up to 2000 books. In 2012, while the number of books read of male tend to uplift remarkably, the number of books read of female lean to increase slightly. however, since 2012 to 2014 the number of books read of female lean to escalate enormously, which it reached up to 10.000 books.
On the other hand, even though since 2011 to 2013 the number of books read of men gravitate to enhance steadily, albeit in 2014 it too difficult to keep their enhancement. In contrast, although from 2011 to 2012 the number of books read of women is the lowest, albeit in 2013 women could improve their number of books read in the same level with men, and in 2014 they had successful to expand the number of books read steeply.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... and women tend to increase noticeably. however, in 2014 while the number of books read...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ad of female lean to increase slightly. however, since 2012 to 2014 the number of books...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.532 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29303292606 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.392 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5440145224 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.625 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.25 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339969393442 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206828220007 0.103423049105 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122112268916 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265170271035 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726272604301 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.