The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line chart indicates the number of requests sent to the Tourist Information Office from a city, which is recorded from January to June in 2011.
In general, there are two trends among the three ways of requirements. By comparison, the figures of people choosing telephone and direct meeting shared the upward trend throughout the entire period, that of letter or email experienced a downward trend and became the least common method.
The number of enquiries by telephone was around 900, which was twice higher than that of requests in person in January. Interestingly, the telephone and person methods slightly fluctuated, after which they matched the similar data in the middle of May. The two figures continuously grew with different pace. Indeed, the increase in telephone method was less rapid than in person. Therefore, while the former reached a number of 1400 requests, the latter occupied the first position at 1800 enquiries in June.
Letter or email was the second most popular form at 800 compared to the others in the first month. A slight decrease was witnessed until March, followed by a noticeable drop to roughly under 400, then the data remained the lowest at the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recorded from January to June in 2011. In general, there are two trends among t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to telephone'
Suggestion: to telephone
...parison, the figures of people choosing telephone and direct meeting shared the upward tr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57415279777 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3029800344 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108496643964 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369363131078 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514261245038 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675905416857 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604480493493 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.