The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates the amount of questions reported by the Tourist Information Office in a single city over a half year time in the year 2011.
Overall, It can be seen that people at that time were least interested in reporting via letter or email.
Firstly, looking at the enquiries recorded In person. The trend towards communicating in person has seen a significant growth over the period. In detail, starting from January the enquiries were just more than 400 and in May it was doubled. Ultimately reaching the highest number among the other two at 1900 queries. Secondly, Telephone is the second most favourable mode of approaching to the tourist office. It was started with a hunge number at around 900 people enquiredin january and then it fell down in february by 100; but, again it started jumpig and reached at 1000 questions in april. From then, a steady upward trend can be seen with a maximum of 1600 concerns in june.
On the other hand, people has shown least interest in communicating through letter or email and that's the reason, a gradual downward trend can be observed. Started in june with just below 800 concerns and then a steady flow till march. After that, the decrement started and ended in m ay at 350 enquiries and then ended with same numbers in june.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'shown the least'.
Suggestion: shown the least
... june. On the other hand, people has shown least interest in communicating through lette...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...mmunicating through letter or email and thats the reason, a gradual downward trend ca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75555555556 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49002355088 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582222222222 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4770666157 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126570001262 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475297379198 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628846667613 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943006073706 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089326524874 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.