Currently, the education system around the world is changing. Some system demands pupils to focus on selected subjects after their fifteen. Whereas, other systems demand students to learn multiple subjects until high school. In this essay, both views have been considered and concluded in the end.
On the first hand, studying limited subjects benefits pupils to explore the particular subject in deep and understand each and every aspect of the topic. Therefore, students in their major can select only a few subjects and perform the case study, which reflects their level of understanding of that subject. Further, It also releases the pressure of focusing on an exaggerated syllabus. For example, it is compulsory for doctors to select a particular field of study to understand the concept of the subject in detail.
On the second hand, the students studying a variety of subjects can gain extra knowledge apart from their superior subjects. More exactly, It is favorable for those creative minds whose interests start developing as they start learning new subjects. For example, students studying engineering have to undergo studying a variety of subjects because, engineers have a lot of concepts in each and every field, to understand everything one has to study all the given data for better understanding.
I would like to conclude this essay by saying that, both systems of studying are better at their place because both have their importance in their respective systems. In my opinion, studying a limited range of subjects can be much better for personal understanding of the following subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... selected subjects after their fifteen. Whereas, other systems demand students to learn...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, apart from, as to, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28404669261 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72366870402 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575875486381 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2595301316 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.461538462 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297538542043 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113810137249 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830679657709 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190467224063 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654330242033 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.