Some systems require students to specialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen. Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of two education systems and what is better?
Difference between education systems and which is better is one of the controversy topics among students and parents. Some system offer limited subjects for pupils to specialize in since entering high school. Whereas, other systems require their schoolchildren to finish a variety of courses. This essay whill discuss about the upsides of both kinds of education structures.
According to the supporters of the former systems, focusing on some specific classes helps students concentrate more on their selected fields of studies. This means that in this type of learning, students are prepared specifically for their post-secondary education. For example, if one student prefers health science study, he will only need to enroll in science classes. Moreover, this education system spares youths more free time due to fewer homeworks. Teenagers then can spend more time partaking activities they like rather than studying whole day.
On the other hand, advocates of later systems believe that studying a wide range of lectures equips students knowledge, which is considered necessary for being adaptive. In other words, having broad skills allow children, whom may confuse in choosing what to pursue, to have numerous choices of study. As a result,students are able to consider applying for any faculties after high school.
In sum up, both systems have their own potentiality in developing important skills for students. However, children usually have restricted strength to handle a large scale of knowledge, or have only one or two favorite disciplines. Learning in the systems which offer a wide range of subject, therefore, is redundant. Consequentially, narrowing the amount of courses from high school which are essential for future study is the better system for every children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun classes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e time, since they less homework due to less classes. Therefore, teenagers can spend...
^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'systems'' or 'system's'?
Suggestion: systems'; system's
... for many faculties. In sum up, both systems ave their own potentiality in developin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, of course, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48675496689 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78278311179 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639072847682 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2168900923 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324041267434 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969785220044 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841551180347 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190279054286 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870725060192 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.