The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the number of enquiries that people sent to the Tourist Information Office in a city from January to June in 2011.
Overall, the quantity of enquiries which were sent in person and by telephone to the Tourist Information Office experienced a steady increase during the period shown. Meanwhile, the number of enquires received by the office by letter or email inclined to decrease over that six-month period.
In January, over 400 queries were sent to the Tourist Information Office in person while this number of queries which were sent to the office by telephone was higher, with 900 enquiries. Nevertheless, in the middle of March in 2011, the figure of inquiries people sent in person exceeded that of inquiries acquired by telephone. From that time, the number of queries addressed in person underwent a significant surge before reach a peak of 1900 queries in June while this quantity of inquiries acquired by telephone was 1600.
In the meanwhile, the number of enquiries that city dwellers sent to the office by letter or email was lower than that of enquiries which people sent to the office in person or by telephone. In January, there was nearly 800 queries sent by letter or email to the office, which was even higher that of queries conveyed personally. However, from March, this number constantly drop and hit the bottom with only nearly 400 enquiries in June.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95319148936 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56883857867 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395744680851 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4245677206 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226845754406 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123202981126 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107964008226 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203133687485 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112644936476 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.