The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table indicates the amount of land for forests in six different parts of the world in three years (1990, 2000 and 2005).
Overall, Europe had the largest amount of forested land in all three years. It is also noticeable that Oceania was the area with the least amount of forested land.
Between 1900 and 2005, the figure for forest area in Europe rose from 989 to 1001 millions of hectares. Similarly, Asia saw a slight increase in its forested land, from 576 to 584 millions of hectares.
The trends for Africa, North America, Oceania and South America were noticeably different. In Africa, the amount of forested land fell from 749 to 691 millions of hectares. In the same way, in 1990, 199 millions of hectares of land was used for forest, however, in 2005, the figure for this was only 197 millions of hectares. During the same period, the amounts of forest area in North America and South Africa declined by 705 and 882 millions of hectares.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1001 million'.
Suggestion: 1001 million
... forest area in Europe rose from 989 to 1001 millions of hectares. Similarly, Asia saw a slight ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '584 million'.
Suggestion: 584 million
...rease in its forested land, from 576 to 584 millions of hectares. The trends for Africa, N...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '691 million'.
Suggestion: 691 million
...mount of forested land fell from 749 to 691 millions of hectares. In the same way, in 1990, 199...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 200, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '199 million'.
Suggestion: 199 million
... of hectares. In the same way, in 1990, 199 millions of hectares of land was used for forest, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 301, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '197 million'.
Suggestion: 197 million
..., in 2005, the figure for this was only 197 millions of hectares. During the same period, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 432, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '882 million'.
Suggestion: 882 million
...ca and South Africa declined by 705 and 882 millions of hectares.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26137211774 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0575441826 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.4444444444 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165953503785 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820233836187 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479534441421 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11717492324 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372220025885 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.