The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
The line graph compares the quantity of foreign travelers visiting three natural destinations in a European nation from 1987 to 2007.
It is clear that those places attracted more visitors over that period, with the most significant change belonging to the figure for the lakes. Coastal areas were usually the favorite destination.
In 1987, 40 thousand foreigners paid visits to places near the sea, doubling the number of international holidaymakers to mountainous ones. Similarly, the later was twofold higher than the quantity of visits to the lakes, at 10 thousand.
From that time onwards, all the places welcomed more people from other countries. To specify, after a marginal initial fall of only about 5 thousand in the first five years, the number of overseas tourists to coastal areas climbed moderately to a peak of around 75 thousand in 2007. Likewise, the mountains, despite many erratic periods, experienced a 15 thousand rise over the period shown. The number of visitors to the lakes had rocketed to peak at 75 thousand in 2002 before decreasing by roughly 25 thousand for the last five years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, similarly, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14835164835 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7152031639 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6420690637 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167264040778 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626305008601 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650426613555 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10381730316 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634602156736 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.