The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the number of travelers going overseas to some particular places from 1987 to 2007.
It is noticeable that there was an upward trend each in the coast and mountains. On the other hand, the remaining figure stabilized during the period.
In 1987, international visitors spending money to visit the coast, the mountains and the lakes in a European region respectively at 40 thousands, 20 thousands and a half of 20 thousands. Over the 15-year period, the coast figure grew by 20 thousands. Additionally, there was a rise of the lakes and reached a peak of more than 70 thousands. Unlike the 2 remaining figures, the lakes continued to remain relatively stable.
In 2002, the attracted guests increased slightly from 30 thousands to 35 thousands afterwards in 2007. On contrary, the coast witnessed a significant increase at 75 thousands; however, regarding the lakes trend, after reaching a peak of more than 70 thousands, the number of foreigners who were fascinated fell substantially at 40 thousands in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me particular places from 1987 to 2007. It is noticeable that there was an upwar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng figure stabilized during the period. In 1987, international visitors spending...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...like the 2 remaining figures, the lakes continued to remain relatively stable. In 2002, the at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... continued to remain relatively stable. In 2002, the attracted guests increased ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15294117647 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02426175612 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0525517564 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114424995313 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451647624516 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717826179632 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843251613005 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867965943351 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.