The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts information about the number of foreign travellers to three given regions, namely: the coast, the mountains and the lakes, from 1987 to 2007.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that at the beginning of the period, visitors travelled the most to the coast and the least to the Lakes area. Throughout the period, the number of foreign travellers to the Lakes and the coast fluctuated but peaked in 2007, whereas this figure of the mountains area experienced an upward trend until significantly went down in 2002 afterwards.
In 1987, there were 40.000 visitors who went to the coast for travel while this number of travellers of the Lakes was four times smaller. In upcoming years, the number of people travelled to the coast and the mountains witnessed a fluctuation but this figure of the Lakes ara increased gradually until reached its peak in 2002 at more than 70.000 visitors.
At the end of the period, the coast became the area which had most visitors of 75.000 visitors. By contrast, after experiencing a sharp decrease, the mountains only had 50.000 travellers. Simultaneously, the Lakes visitors only stood at 35.000 people, caused by a slowest growth rate among three countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mountains'' or 'mountain's'?
Suggestion: mountains'; mountain's
...ked in 2007, whereas this figure of the mountains area experienced an upward trend until ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... only stood at 35.000 people, caused by a slowest growth rate among three countri...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08780487805 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69952294902 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546341463415 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6531721041 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120489773179 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622499621109 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469733893414 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905964318128 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046889301369 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.