The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture depicts how many overseas travelers from many different regions in the European continent at 5-year intervals over the period of 20 years, commencing from 1987.
In general, the number of overseas visitors to the coast is moved-upwards, while the figure for the other regions had some fluctuations over the period.
As far as the first year of the surveyed stint is concerned, approximately 40 thousand visitors were recorded, making it the highest compared to the other areas. Moreover, the number of travelers to the mountains was two-fold as much as that of the coast, with respective figures being nearly 20 and 10 thousand visitors.
Thereafter, the figure for visitors to lakes sharply increased to reach a peak of approaching 80 thousand visitors in 2002, which was followed by a substantial decrease to a low of about 50 thousand visitors in 2007, while the number of visitors to the coast had a significant increase, approximately 73 thousand travelers over the period. As regards visitors to the mountain, it experienced a slight drop in the middle of 1992 and 1997 period, then it had some fluctuations, which fell within a range of from 20 to 38 thousand visitors in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...epicts how many overseas travelers from many different regions in the European continent at 5-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, then, while, as regards, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92730251255 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3350339915 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.666666667 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128535177802 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066135205215 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229545364568 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790548695124 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166913717027 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.