The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph compares the numbers of visitors choosing the different accommodations (on ships and island) on Caribbean island during the period from 2010 and 2017.
Overall, There is a significantly increase in the total tourists coming to Caribbean during the period shown. However, people tend to stay on cruise ships more than on ground at the end of the year 2017.
At the first glance, in 2010, around one million people went to Caribbean island to take a rest. On the same year, People who stayed in buildings was around 0.75 million, was most triple than on the boats. In 2016, the total tourists grew to a unbelievable number, nearly 2.75 millions. The number of travelers visiting here lived on the ships overcame the numbers of people living on a house in island, at 1.5 million and 1.25 millions respectively.
At the end of 2017, Around 3.5 millions people came across this Caribbean to enjoy their trip. While communities travelled to Caribbean island and took the ships to live was 1.5 million, the number of people tried to relax at a house on the island reached a peak at 2 millions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...from 2010 and 2017. Overall, There is a significantly increase in the total tourists coming to Caribbe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ts. In 2016, the total tourists grew to a unbelievable number, nearly 2.75 millio...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75520833333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53439340999 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5604163344 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172520358348 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836625663029 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055416669582 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126046290414 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525624344315 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.