The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the change of the quantity of visitors (in million) in a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the figure increased every year except for the year 2016 where it remained unchanged. In addition, the number of people preferring staying on cruise ships to island witnessed a remarkable growth and that of the other option also rose over the period.
The year 2011 registered the increase of tourists choosing cruise ships for their trip from 0,25 to 0,5 and the stability of those who chose to stay on island, at 0,75. In the next year, less people stayed on ships as the number decreased by 0,25 while the number of people staying on island saw a sudden rise from 0,75 to 1,25. One year after that, the figure for both options increased by 0,25.
From 2013 to 2015, more and more people spent their time on ships as the number in 2015 was 2,5 times that in 2013, with 1,25. However, the number of those who preferred staying on island remained stable at 1,5 through the course. In the last three years of the period, the figure for tourists staying on cruise ships witnessed a continuous growth from 1,25 to 2 whereas that of those having a different choice saw a small dip and then increased to 1,5. Noticeably, the total visitors to this island at the end of the period was 3 times that in the beginning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...e change of the quantity of visitors in million in a Caribbean island from 2010 to 201...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of the quantity of visitors in million in a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017....
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to cruise'
Suggestion: to cruise
...tered the increase of tourists choosing cruise ships for their trip from 0,25 to 0,5 a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...y on island, at 0,75. In the next year, less people stayed on ships as the number de...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5867768595 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27675450854 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50826446281 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1467264112 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993161951547 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487106615236 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037285468162 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806940271795 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359489662495 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.