The line graph breaks down data on visitors of the Caribbean island over a period of 7 years. It is unmistakable that there was a reducing trend for total visitors and visitors who staying on cruise ships, despite a slightly climbing figures for visitors who stayed on the island.
On the areas of total visitors and visitors staying on cruise ships, one sees a trend of a surge. The pattern was first demonstrated by total visitors, which experience a major increase from only 1 million to 3.5 millions people in 2017, a gain of 2.5 million people. Matters developed in a similar way for visitors who stayed on a cruise ship, as this area had decisively grown to 2 million people by 2017 from its number in 2010.
There was a different course of events for numbers of visitors staying on island because of the fact that this area marginally gained. One sees an increasing trend in a period of 2010-2014 as shown by growth to 1.5 million people by 2014. There was a fluctuation in regards to a period of 2015-2017, which totaled a recovery to 1.5 million people between 2015 and 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... 2.5 million people. Matters developed in a similar way for visitors who stayed on a cruise shi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...r numbers of visitors staying on island because of the fact that this area marginally gained. One sees ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...eople by 2014. There was a fluctuation in regards to a period of 2015-2017, which totaled a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63402061856 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55776603193 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.158473653 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902970575086 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049452963831 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352615152811 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695877508759 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190573635873 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.