The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
The graph illustrates the number of candidates(male and female) with respect to time(1992-2007) who are University graduates in Canada.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that the number of both, male and female graduates in Canada increased from the year 1992, which was the lowest to 2007 being the highest number of graduate students.
In the year 1992 male graduates were just about 70,000 as compared to female graduates being slightly less than 100,000. These figures increased to approximately mid-way between 90,000 and 100,000 for males and almost 150,000 for females in the year 2007.
However, this increase hasn't been steady over the years. There have been some fluctuations. In the year 1995, male candidates increased to around 80,000 whereas female candidates rose to a little above 100,000. These figures then declined in the year 1998. The numbers in 1998, for both, males and females were similar as in 1992. While the male candidates again saw a decline in the year 2001 as compared to 2000, the figures for female candidates saw a steady increase.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nd female with respect to time1992-2007 who are University graduates in Canada. Overal...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... the year 2007. However, this increase hasnt been steady over the years. There have ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, whereas, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07386363636 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57249612478 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551136363636 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6085678084 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2384977767 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10571588298 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152561100127 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227393419719 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171493366024 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.