The given vertical graph delineates the data regarding the proportion of part time workers in four different nations; England,Northern Ireland, Scotland and Whales in 1980 and 2010.
Overall, in both the years maximum people who work part-time job in whales was highest as compared to others.
It is crystal clear that in England, around 25% of people were doing part-time work in the year 1980 which inclined by 5% in 2010 and reached to 30%.However, the same criteria was followed by Whales. In 1980, the percentage of part-time workers was low which was near about 32%.In 2010, the proportion of part-time employers increased by around 2%.
Moving further, the percentage of part-time employers in 1980, with just over 10%. While, this went up almost 20% in 2010, which is a large increase. Lastly, Northern Ireland was the only country which had a decreasing percentage of part -time workers.In 1980, approximately 15% of individuals did work as part-time.But, in 2010, it decreased by near about 2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...es the data regarding the proportion of part time workers in four different nations; Engl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Northern
...rkers in four different nations; England,Northern Ireland, Scotland and Whales in 1980 an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...clined by 5% in 2010 and reached to 30%.However, the same criteria was followed by Whal...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...orkers was low which was near about 32%.In 2010, the proportion of part-time emplo...
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...easing percentage of part -time workers.In 1980, approximately 15% of individuals ...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...5% of individuals did work as part-time.But, in 2010, it decreased by near about 2%...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14545454545 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8721518411 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3115601814 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239363088401 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124795404433 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585592032248 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15047850992 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549581105486 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.