The graph below shows the percentage of people who travelled by bus in the UK from 2009 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of people who travelled by bus in the UK from

2009 to 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features

and make comparisons where relevant

The rendered bar chart illustrates the proportion of people who used the bus for travelling for various purposes in the britain between 2009 and 2011.

From the overall analysis, it is manifest that the most preferred mode for going shopping, while the least preferred mode for going to work.

At the fleeting glance, it is immensely clear that shopping accounted for 65% and 56% of the number of people used bus in the first two years respectively,subsequent to which the percentage further fell down to 51% in the 2011.In contrast, the figure for work for the year 2009,2010,2011 were recorded to be merely 5%,2%,0% , which happened to be the least.

Probing further, using bus for study purpose stood at 4% in 2009 as against 9% in the following two years.As regards visiting friends, stagnating to just under a fifth(19%) from 2009 to 2010, the percentage of masses rose by 4% in the last year. In 2009, 7% people used bus for day tour,after that this number remained stable in the given two years.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (50 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...art illustrates the proportion of people who used the bus for travelling for var...
^^
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the proportion of people who used the bus for travelling for various purposes ...
^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anifest that the most preferred mode for going shopping, while the least preferr...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the most preferred mode for going shopping, while the least preferred mode...
^^
Line 9, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce, it is immensely clear that shopping accounted for 65% and 56% of the number...
^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that shopping accounted for 65% and 56% of the number of people used bus in th...
^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ounted for 65% and 56% of the number of people used bus in the first two years ...
^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 56% of the number of people used bus in the first two years respectively,subs...
^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , subsequent
...bus in the first two years respectively,subsequent to which the percentage further fell ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: after
...us in the first two years respectively,subsequent to which the percentage further fell dow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars respectively,subsequent to which the percentage further fell down to 51% in...
^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vely,subsequent to which the percentage further fell down to 51% in the 2011.In...
^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which the percentage further fell down to 51% in the 2011.In contrast, the figu...
^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... further fell down to 51% in the 2011.In contrast, the figure for work for the y...
^^
Line 9, column 331, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...2011 were recorded to be merely 5%,2%,0% , which happened to be the least. Pr...
^^
Line 13, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...s against 9% in the following two years.As regards visiting friends, stagnating t...
^^
Line 13, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...9% in the following two years.As regards visiting friends, stagnating to just und...
^^
Line 13, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m 2009 to 2010, the percentage of masses rose by 4% in the last year. In 2009, 7%...
^^
Line 13, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , after
...In 2009, 7% people used bus for day tour,after that this number remained stable in the...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, as regards, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86705202312 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84851148915 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.7985074508 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.4 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 1.69756097561 1119% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155506751889 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966323182896 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046719603001 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102788714762 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536839961909 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.