THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS THE POLLUTION LEVELS IN LONDON BETWEEN 1600 AND 2000
The line graph gives us information about the amount of Sulphur dioxide and smoke measured in micrograms per cubic meter that causes pollution in London from year 1600 to 2000. Overall, it can be seen that in year 1600 Sulphur dioxide and smoke has similar trend which started on a low level then suddenly rose and peaked in 1700 but fluctuated hardly until it reached at its lowest point in year 2000.
It is interesting to see that sulfur dioxide started in a baseline measurement of more than one micrograms per cubic meter and suddenly moved its way up until it reached its peak in 1700s measuring more than 750 micrograms per cubic meter. It then fluctuated between the year 1750 and able to rise again by about 1000 micrograms per cubic metre in the year 1850s but experienced a sudden fluctuating drop until it reached 0 in year 2000 respectively.
On the other hand, the amount of smoke that caused pollution in London is not that high when compared to Sulphur dioxide although they both have similar trend. It started to rise slightly in small amount between years 1600 to 1850 and reached its peak measuring approximately 500 micrograms of smoke per cubic metre in year 1900. It then experienced a sudden fluctuating drop in mid 1900s until it reached zero in year 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: hardly fluctuated
...en suddenly rose and peaked in 1700 but fluctuated hardly until it reached at its lowest point in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48961894055 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2917976987 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.714285714 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150743938209 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857209490731 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638496991315 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123865569286 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706765425456 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.