The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart shows data about the level of contamination in smoke and sulphur dioxide in London from 1600 to 2000. Overall, the levels of both pollutants formed a similar pattern during this period. Also there were always higher levels of sulphur dioxide than smoke in the atmosphere.
As is observed from the graph, in 1550, London had totally not affected by smoke and sulphur dioxide, however experiencing next 100 years level of pollution in smoke had reached in roughly 100 micrograms per cubic metre compared to particularly higher number for contamination in sulphur dioxide. It is noticeable that these figure continued to increase in following 30 decades. Specific, amount of pollution in sulphur dioxide witnessed a rapidly rise and stood a peak of nearly 1.000 micrograms per cubic metre in 1850. Meanwhile, the figure for smoke gained the highest in 1900, with number reaching of approximately 500. It is interesting that after sharply growth with some minimal varies, level of pollution for both smoke and sulphur dioxide started decreased dramatically with some fluctuations in the last period years. Surprisingly, in 2000 there was no longer contamination smoke and sulphur dioxide in London.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d a similar pattern during this period. Also there were always higher levels of sulp...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dioxide than smoke in the atmosphere. As is observed from the graph, in 1550, ...
^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rapidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
... pollution in sulphur dioxide witnessed a rapidly rise and stood a peak of nearly 1.000 microg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28497409326 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79481692381 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3032454085 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125226900602 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589019906359 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527216462548 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121675526105 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400816391185 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.