Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
There is a growing tendency that globalisation has increasingly gained popularity on over the world. This is primary reason as to why scientists predict that human beings are likely to use a global language. However I contend that benefits of speaking a language is undeniable, this lead to several adverse consequences for the society.
One the one hand, it is commonly believed that global individuals obtain considerable advantages when creating connection by using a language. The first prominent issue that the same language may facilitate in communication and insight into culture among the countries. There is a clear evidence for this is that authorities in variety of countries might comprehend and response positively in global conferences. As a result, they can avoid to misunderstand others by language disparity. The second thing that is worthing mention that tourism industry will be more beneficial from using a same language. The visitors have no hestiation to travelling and discovering of history or culture in rest of the world. Therefore, any country can not only gain more profitable for tourism but also spreads indigeous hestiges and culture for world community.
On the other hand, it is argued that language homegeneity is more likely to effect adversely on the society. Initially, prevailance of same language has pushed some minority languages on the verge of extiction. In fact, it is urgent that speaking mother language gain less importance in some countries due to popularity of english or china. Every now and then, the world will loss culture indentities that are established over millions of years. Furthermore, loss of mother language can be potential to eliminate distintive culture of any nation. For instance, people those using American language are incline to wearing western styles or eating exotic food instead of treasuring their cultural value. In this scenario, the global community will be motonomous by this resemblance.
In conclusion, it seems to me that there is no denying that speaking a language can be advantagous in some reasons, however, drawbacks of this phenomenon should be considered carefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a growing tendency that globali...
^^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...gs are likely to use a global language. However I contend that benefits of speaking a l...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... adverse consequences for the society. One the one hand, it is commonly believe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid misunderstanding'.
Suggestion: avoid misunderstanding
...obal conferences. As a result, they can avoid to misunderstand others by language disparity. The secon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tiges and culture for world community. On the other hand, it is argued that lan...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: Now and then
... due to popularity of english or china. Every now and then, the world will loss culture indentitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill be motonomous by this resemblance. In conclusion, it seems to me that there...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37758112094 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99996374299 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557522123894 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5292756994 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.277777778 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134695953249 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044677936774 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499845823518 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911722422738 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347083538143 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.