The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the data of total population in India and China in 2000 and displays the expected growth till the year 2050. The units are measured in billions.
It is clear from the graph that, in 2000, there were more people lived in China than in India. The number of Chinese were 1.2 billions and the Indians were 1 billions. From 2000 to untill now, India has been nearly 0.3 billion growth in the total population rate while, Chinese has been increased by 0.1 billion.
With regards to Indian population will continue to increase and then it will be surpassed the Chinese population in 2030 before expected to growing to 1.6 billion in 2050. In contrast, China will reach the peak level in 2030 before predicted to declining slowly into 1.4 billion in 2050.
In conclusion, although, initially the least number of population was reported from India, it will be expected to undertaken the Chinese population over the 50 year period.
India will experience a steady population growth without any fluctuations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
2019-10-29 | ngothithunguyet | 67 | view |
2019-10-07 | Nehaa Sharma | 67 | view |
2019-09-04 | lordwind | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the popularity of different political parties in a countrt before and after the election The election was won by the Conservative party and they formed government with the Liberal Democrats party 77
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The pie charts show a comparison of different kynds of energy production in france in 2 years. 56
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Few artists ever manage to achieve fame let alone a liveable wage Often artists struggle to make ends meet for most of their lives For this reason some people believe that it is irresponsible for a parent to encourage their child to pursue an artistic car 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98265895954 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49676191111 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4372216353 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267439832495 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11601803961 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813039545556 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164468653866 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449857123652 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.