The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph compares the information from a research taken into how much citizens china and india have had from 2000 to the present and shows the anticipated population during the former-half of twenty-first century among these two Asia countries. Units are measured by billions people.
Overall, according to the data, the number of Indians was predicted to rise gradually over the period whereas china population was said to decrease significantly in the future.
To be specific, in 2000, there was about 1 billion people legally lived in india, far more lower than the figure for china at the same time. However, this number upsurge steadily over the time period taken research, and finally predicted to reach its peak at 1.6 billion people at the end of 2050.
Turning to the other competitor, number of Chinese people witnessed an increased in the past years from more than 1.2 billion to more than 1.4 citizens in the present year. After that, experts anticipated that the population would fall insignificantly to just under 1.4 billion in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ormation from a research taken into how much citizens china and india have had from ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ion from a research taken into how much citizens china and india have had from 2000 to t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 87, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
...lion people legally lived in india, far more lower than the figure for china at the same t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31638418079 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62751348713 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9800904277 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173217629657 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701533003592 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469934234369 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980235949475 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267053975347 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.