The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph represents the information about the number of increase total population (in billions) of two nations which includes China and India during the fifty-year period from 2000 to 2050.

Overall, there has upward trend in India's population growth whereas China is declining gradually and has a slightly fluctuation in it.

We can see the difference among two countries since 2000. In India, the population growth rate was only 1 billion while China's accounted for more than 1,2 billion.

According to the graph, China's population development will remain stable until 2030 by over 1,4 billion and at that time, the rise of inhabitants will progressively decrease by about 1,4 billion to 2050. However, the residential thriving speed in India rises dramatically, has an equal figure with China's in 2030. After a period of 20 years between 2030 and 2050, the data of resident development will strikingly increase by nearly 1,6 billion people by 2050.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...o 2050. Overall, there has upward trend in Indias population growth whereas Chi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fluctuation') instead of another adjective.
...as China is declining gradually and has a slightly fluctuation in it. We can see the difference...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y and has a slightly fluctuation in it. We can see the difference among two coun...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24516129032 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72336023084 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670967741935 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4324439039 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277308830051 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125629958783 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509935494162 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172644262946 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272255442038 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.