The line graph compares the recycling rate of selected materials within one country, from 1980 to 2010.
The recycling rate of the materials( glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics) showed a steady but a significant rise over the period, except for paper and cardboard, it experienced a downward trend.
In 1982, the recycling rate of the glass containers which was at 50 %, after 8 years it declined by 10% and then rose again by 10% in 1994. It continued in rising until it reaches 60 % by 2010. Aluminium cans' rate increased sharply throughout the period starting at below 10% in 1986 ending at 47% in the ending in 2010, at the same time plastics' rate increased modestly.
Among the four materials, paper and cardboard experienced a fluctuation trend. It stood at the highest peak in 1982 by 65%, increased by 5% in 1986 and then fell back to the same percentage in 1990. After 4 years it rose by almost a15%. However, if you compare all recycling rates at the end, paper and cardboard's rate was still the highest at 70%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rdboard, it experienced a downward trend In 1982, the recycling rate of the glass...
^^^
Line 6, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll back to the same percentage in 1990. After 4 years it rose by almost a15%. However...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7182320442 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61714977815 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.8473135266 43.030603864 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127461297761 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631436643837 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749206489464 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107735983803 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845827213999 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.