The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The given line chart illustrates the percentage of recycling of four different materials used by people of one country between years 1982 and 2010.
Overall, the proportion of paper and cardboard recycling remained the greatest among selected materials throughout the period. However, the recycling rate of aluminium cans showed the most increase, while the share of recycled plastics were stable at the same period of time.
In 1982, people of the country recycled over 60 per cent of paper and cardboard they used. Then this figure slightly increased to 70 per cent in 1986 but dipped in 1990 and grew again to 80 per cent in 1994. However, it gradually decreased to 70 per cent in 2010. At the beginning of the period, a half of used glass containers was recycled but the figure declined by 10 per cent to 40 per cent in 1990 and then steadily rose by 20 per cent, reaching 60 per cent in 2010.
In the contrast, aluminium cans and plastics were almost not recycled at the beginning. But aluminium cans recycling experienced a rapid grow from below 10 percent to about 45 per cent, by approximately 40 per cent, throughout the period. Meanwhile, the rate of plastics recycling remained at the level under 10 per cent between 1982 and 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...cycled plastics were stable at the same period of time. In 1982, people of the country re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82407407407 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59404721098 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5141950432 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203183882466 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100345900694 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631766687641 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158593476529 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069560620812 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.