The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of four different materials that were recycled in a particular country between 1982 and 2010. Overall, during 1982 to 2010 period, total line tend to rise compare with the first time. paper and cardboard took up highest, and then it gradually downed in the last time. However, this trend being highest compare with total, whereas plastics started lowest, afterward increased but insignificant. At begin with, we can see the rate of paper and cardboard tend to up about 70% and then down back 60% until 1994 regain to increase 80%, finally, it a significant decreased (70%) but being the highest ranking in 2010 . With glass containers began about 50% and sharply declined (40%) in 1990, then back to first place in 1994, between 1994 and 2010 there is a gradually growth about 10%. Addition, Aluminium started about 3%- 4% in 1986, after that there is a dramatically jump about 40% in the end time. finally, plastics took up about 1% in 1990 , and then it rose significant in 1994. it leveled off untill 2002, and growth nearly 10% in 2002, reached the lowest on ranking position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Paper
...nd to rise compare with the first time. paper and cardboard took up highest, and then...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the highest'.
Suggestion: being the highest
...d in the last time. However, this trend being highest compare with total, whereas plastics st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 651, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...0% but being the highest ranking in 2010 . With glass containers began about 50% a...
^^
Line 1, column 791, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...in 1994, between 1994 and 2010 there is a gradually growth about 10%. Addition, Aluminium started ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 891, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('jump') instead of another adjective.
...out 3%- 4% in 1986, after that there is a dramatically jump about 40% in the end time. finally, pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 938, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...tically jump about 40% in the end time. finally, plastics took up about 1% in 1990 , an...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 980, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nally, plastics took up about 1% in 1990 , and then it rose significant in 1994. i...
^^
Line 1, column 1021, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
..., and then it rose significant in 1994. it leveled off untill 2002, and growth nea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48351456949 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8409687587 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0894707549244 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048162252061 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102569930766 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894707549244 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.