The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the rate of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012. Overall, during 2012 frame, engineering department was a notable major to male, this trend being the highest figure, whilst, education was a major least male study in. In contrast, education extremely attracted with female, and engineering still rarely girls.
To begin with, we can see art was a department which was attended by a large of members, with female about nearly 60% and male about 44%. On the other hand, in business, the number of male learned at this major about 64% double compare with female. Moreover, education was a hot department in this period to female, this trend being the first position (76%), whereas, the number of students joined education in male just one thirds female. Meanwhile, engineering had plenty of male who embarked in, measuring about 84% that higher than the amount of female one fifths. Addition, law had female who joined more than male about 20%, with male(60%) and female(40%). To be continue, student searched in medicine major seem equal, about (49%-50%). Finally, with science are researched by male more than female a half of faculty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one fifth', 'a fifth', or simply 'fifths'?
Suggestion: one fifth; a fifth; fifths
...% that higher than the amount of female one fifths. Addition, law had female who joined mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, still, third, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02487562189 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47273191204 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4943657501 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169181599009 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843964374987 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10756480991 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166997268731 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791730015278 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.