The graph shows the percentage of male and female Academic Staff members across the faculties of major University in 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied histogram delineates the information men and women academic staff across the faculties run by a major university during the year 2012. The data is calibrated in per centum.
To commence with, it is seen that, in year 2012 there were only three faculties where females were leading from men which were arts, education and medicine. Furthermore, in faculties such as engineering, business and science womens were extremely less, compared to men with 18%, 26% and 29% respectively.
Probing ahead, males were three time more than females in engineering faculty with 82%. Similarly, in business, law, science men were half more than women with 62%, 60% and 61% during the year 2012.
Overall, it is evident that, men were highest in most of the faculties and they were maximum in engineering and minimum in education in the year 2012, whereas women were topmost in education and least in engineering totally opposite from men.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, similarly, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 713.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09285714286 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61996845284 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9300049612 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150069651417 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795577093379 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083120536267 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108417267172 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717269398428 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.