The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line graph compares the percentage of the elderly between the age of 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA over a century from 1940.
Overall, there is an obvious upward trend in the percentage of people aged 65 and over in both three countries during the period shown. From the country at the bottom of all, Japan is expected to reach the highest rank in terms of elderly proportion in the year 2040.
During the first 40-year period, USA experienced a steady rise in the percentage of elderly population, maintaining its lead in 1980. The figure for Sweden is similarly on the way up, with a rise of approximately 7% in 1940 to around 14% in the year 1980. By contrast, Japan's figure fell slightly to roughly 3% in 1960 and remained constant for at at 25 following years.
Falling a little bit at the end of the 1990s, Sweden turned its figure around to almost 20% in 2010, surpassing USA's figure by roughly 6%. While the former suffered a dip again in the next 10 years before bouncing back, the latter continued to rise. Both are predicted to pick theirs proportion up to around 25% and 23% respectively in 2040. Meanwhile in Japan, after a gradual increase between 1990 and 2030, it is forecast that the figure will rocket to approximately 27% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | nguyenhnil | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows the number of visitors to Tabard Towers Theme Park each month last year 82
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 98
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: at
...ly 3% in 1960 and remained constant for at at 25 following years. Falling a little b...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...or at at 25 following years. Falling a little bit at the end of the 1990s, Sweden turned ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...round 25% and 23% respectively in 2040. Meanwhile in Japan, after a gradual increase betw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55411255411 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51890027683 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.2872785597 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.2 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190693562793 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769177472387 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948047686496 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148647372203 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116111301634 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.