The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 20202 by four different modes of transportation.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The graph illustrates the transportation of the amount of goods, using different types of methods, in the United Kingdom between the years 1974 to 2002.
Overall, the quantities of goods transported by all the different means have increased. At the beginning of the time period, the most amount of goods were transported using road networks and water-ways, whereas the least amount was moved around the country utilizing rails and pipelines.
Roads seem like the most popular way of transporting stuff around the country, as it transported about 70 million tons in 1974, which reached up to 100 million tons in 2002. The water transport was almost the same as rail-transport in the beginning but the former saw a significant surge in early 1980s, then it plateaued the next two decades or so, finally it skyrocketed to above 60 million tons, the second highest after roads.
The railway network saw some decline in its transportation of goods throughout the 1980s and 1990s, however it recovered and reached almost the same level as it was in the beginning i.e. about 40 million tons. The least used method was pipelines, it transported about 5 million in 1974, however it rose steadily throughout time period until 2002, when it was above 20 million tons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e beginning i.e. about 40 million tons. The least used method was pipelines, it tra...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75147455829 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5752099368 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.857142857 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13613370241 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810672467583 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498415001117 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101117750534 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428106596831 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.