The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the number of consumer products carried in the united kingdom over 28 years from 1974 to 2002. Units are shown in million tonnes.

Overall, the most amount of goods transported in the UK had been through roads while water and rail were equally popular at the beginning of the period, however, the water transportation exceeded the rail. The pipeline was the least popular mode of transportation of goods in England.

With regards to the road, about 70 million tonnes of good were transported in 1974. This figure fluctuated over the years. However, in 1994 it dramatically increased to about 100 million tonnes in 2002. This mode of transportation was most popular and widely used from the start to end if the period. The water and rail overlapped at about 40 million tonnes for about 4 years. While in 1978 the water transportation increased over the years, carrying more than 60 million tonnes products in 2002. However, the rail plunged for few years. In 1998 it rose its transportation again to about 41 million tonnes in 2002.

On the other hand, the least popular mode of goods transportation was the pipeline which stood at about 5 million tonnes in 1974. However, in 1982 it surged to about 18 million tonnes and finally crossed over 20 million tonnes in 2002.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (6 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...s from 1974 to 2002. Units are shown in million tonnes. Overall, the most amount of...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87837837838 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66115588976 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472972972973 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9877177523 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3571428571 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166100901824 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707187137796 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576634922142 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114366965313 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370722612504 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.