The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph displays the UK in terms of the quantities of good transportation using the road, water, rail, and pipeline transports from 1974 to 2002, and it is measured by millions of tonnes.
Overall, the number of items delivered in 3 out of 4 modes of transportation experienced an upward trend, excluding the rail one remaining stable during the period shown. Also, the road mode was the most favorable for items transportation.
Initially, the products that transported on the road were by far the highest chosen by the producers, increasing steadily by almost 10 million tonnes in 1990. Also, pipeline users experienced a significant increase in the beginning of six years but then the similar figure remained reasonably steady in the rest of the period at around 25 million tonnes. The figure for water and rail started at an almost similar level, but then the former rose steadily at just above 60 million tonnes, and the latter showed the reverse at around 35 million tonnes.
In 2002, the use of the road in good transportation continued to grow throughout the period, reaching a peak of almost 100 million tonnes. While the figure for pipeline experienced a minimal decline, then it was stable until the end of the year. As the utilizing of rail for delivering good saw a steady incline to the 1974 level, the gap between rail and water modes became narrower at roughly 10 million tonnes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88284518828 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7497913043 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535564853556 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3067417449 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209102972711 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096359415863 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108172817123 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167290059856 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123700006207 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.