The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph gives information about amount of products were transported in the UK by road, water, rail and pipeline from 1974 to 2002. Overall, it can be clearly seen that road was always more preferring transport modes than the rest of other while pipeline formed the lowest part of transit route over the period.
In 1974, approximately 70 million tonnes goods carried via the roads. In the same year, rail and water channels were showed the same number of outputs with just under 40 million tonnes whereas pipeline transported the least quantity of goods with nearly 5 million tonnes.
Between 1974 and 2002, the number of products which removed via road increased steadily from 70 million tonnes to almost 100 million tonnes. Also, pipeline transport mode showed a gradual rise and then nearly 21 million around the end of the period.
Even if the water transport was used a stable pattern from 1982 to nearly 1992, it dropped by 65 million tonnes in 2002. Railway transportation was showed a steep fall in the number of goods in the UK between 1978 and 1992 and then a gradual rise until 2002.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78534031414 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33282355373 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1114730101 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231513187756 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113872252067 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543984798191 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148442801876 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029540048611 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.