The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport
The line graph illustrate the amount of goods ferried by four modes of transport in UK from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, there was a general increase in transportion of various items by road, water and pipeline except for rail which decreased in 1974. Road remained the major transporter of different types of goods, whilst pipeline was marginally used. It is noticeable clearly seen that, there was an instability on all modes of transport systems as shown by highs and lows.
There was a sharp increase on all modes of transport apart from rail throughout the given period. Road was the popular mode of transportation of goods from 1974 at about 70 million tonnes. It rose gradually to around 81 million tonnes in the early 1990s and declined steadily to approximately 78 million tonnes in the late 1990s, then fluctuated rapidly to almost 89 million tonnes in 2002. In terms of pipeline, it contributed insignificantly to movement of goods below other modes of transport. Highlighted on the graph, goods ferried by pipeline were around 4 million tonnes in 1974 and began to rise moderately to late 1990s, as it remained constant in 2002, at almost 62 million tonnes.
Furthermore, in 1974 rail was commonly used than water to ferry goods. From 1978, water became popular and it increased sharply from 40 million tonnes in 1978 to early 1980s, when it was steady. In early 1990s it carried approximately 58 million tonnes and it decreased significantly to about 47 million tonnes in 1998, thereby increasing dramatically to almost 62 million tonnes in 2002. Goods ferried by rail was at 40 million tonnes in 1974 and began to decrease, a dip was din 1984, at around 30 million tonnes. It rose gradually from 1986 and decrease again in 1994 and fluctuated rapidly to almost 41 million tonnes in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly from 1986 and decrease again in 1994 and fluctuated rapidly to almost 41 mill...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, apart from, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 306.0 196.424390244 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92156862745 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73098613598 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4718318577 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242749419754 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120575753971 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118988134079 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229356124813 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151247026742 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.