The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs give information about the price violation of three different categories of beverages and the consumer-price index from 1978 to 2009.
Overall, it is clear that all figures expressed increasing trends in the 1979-2009 period. Although the price of four categories relatively were similar at the starting point in 1979, the fresh fruits and vegetables dramatically reach the peak of the graphs in 2009.
In 1979, although groups started at the same point, at approximately 60, the figure of the fresh fruits and vegetables dropped down to 90 in 1983, which was lower than those of the remaining groups at the same time, at roughly 100. However, after many fluctuations, the figure of the fresh fruits and vegetables rapidly grew up to 330, compared to 210 of the consumer-price index.
Additionally, the figures for the sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks rose from 60 in 1979 to 100 in 1985, which had no significant differences between these two groups during this period. Nevertheless, the sugar and sweets had a significant increasing trend to nearly 200 in 2009, which was higher than that of the fizzy drinks, at only around 100 in this year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 78
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 81
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called pentland from 1950 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below
- the diagram below show how sand dunes are formed 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01025641026 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84092381563 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2943253208 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213404690735 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103221919929 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054053418004 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132554458273 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288919943898 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.