The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000.

The line graph illustrates the amount of money which is spent per person on research into renewable energy in Switzerland, Denmark, Spain,and the UK over a 25 year period, from 1975 to 2000. The units are measured in dollars.

Overall, it is apparent that the spending amount on research for per person in Spain and Denmark followed an upward trend, on the other hand, for Switzerland and the UK it experienced a downward trend.

The expenditure on research for per person in renewable energy in Spain and Denmark rise over the period given. The spending amount for person in research increased gradually, where there was no money spent for research in 1975, at the end of the period, it reached 5 dollars per person, higher than the other three countries. Denmark also saw the similar trend, and in 2000, it spent about 3.5 dollars per person on renewable energy research.

In contrast, the figures for renewable energy research in Switzerland and the UK fluctuated over the next 25 years, and the end of period, in 2000, for both country it was lower than the 1 dollar per person.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (23 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...le energy in Switzerland, Denmark, Spain,and the UK over a 25 year period, from 1975...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8085106383 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53249591045 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494680851064 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7960742306 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217866096594 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120149028928 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710042824816 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151228477104 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602744962519 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.