The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.
The graph compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers meat and poultry consumed per capital in US between1955 to 2012.
It can be seen from the graph that beef is the most favorable one in US meals whereas turkey is eaten the least in most of the time. There was an upward trend and downward trend in the consumption of broilers and beef, respectively.
In 1955, on the average, each person in US ate nearly 60 pounds of beef. The figures went up gradually and reach a peak of 90 pounds in 1976. However, the amount of beef consumption reduced considerably in the following years, down to just 50 pounds per person. In contrast, the figures for broiler rose sharply from under 20 pounds in 1960s to roughly 60 pounds in 2012. Interestingly, broiler surpassed beef in term of consumption in 2009.
There were small changes in the amount of pork and turkey consumption. Pork decreased slightly from 50 pounds in 1955 to around 40 pounds in 2012. Average person in US consumed less and more 10 pounds in given time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...oiler rose sharply from under 20 pounds in 1960s to roughly 60 pounds in 2012. Interest...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed beef in term of consumption in 2009. There were small changes in the amount o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67955801105 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56203518656 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7058419414 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148628662826 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579099623128 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699859942341 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11666370452 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831421689611 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.