The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant.

Given are two maps delineating the contrasts between American and Japanese workplace.
It is perceptible that individuals who work in Japanese office are inclined to work in a shared room while the opposite is true for American employees.
When it comes to a eastern country like Japan, desks for working purposes are put together and occupy nearly the whole area. Beside that, two section managers can effortlessly observe and interact with all staff in the room. At the furthest point of the room, there is an engagement of the depart manager as the highest position of the office with a massive glass window behind to catch the sunlight for the workplace.
Regarding typical American office, it is clear that all zones are separated so employees can work self-contained. At the middle of the room, L-shaped desks are placed in center alignment with 4 ones each row. Moving to the right of the room, headquarter positions are settled side by side which are 2 section managers and a bigger room for department manager. Furthermore, on the left side of the room, there are two functional rooms for staff - printer area, storage respectively and two rooms for meeting purposes.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r American employees. When it comes to a eastern country like Japan, desks for w...
^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... of the room, there is an engagement of the depart manager as the highest position of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99492385787 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70895456839 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604060913706 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4833660564 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.062529014828 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324371297879 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405040566477 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583084570989 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370661901847 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.