The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
https://ielts-simon.com/.a/6a0120a5bb05d8970c0120a8cfa023970b-pi
The line graph compares the amount of acid rain emissions in the UK from four sectors over a period of 17 years, starting from 1991.
In general, there was a significant decrease in the amount of acid rain gases from 1990 to 2007. In particular, the UK saw a dramatic increase in the figure for acid rain emissions by electricity, gas and water supply sector.
In 1991, around 3.4 million tons of acid rain emissions were electricity, gas and water supply sector, and the amount of acid rain emissions from other industries was lower, at 2.1 million tons. Meanwhile, the figures for the domestic sector and transport and communities sector were the lowest, at 0.6 and 0.7 million tons. From 1993 to 2001, this country underwent a much decline, at only under 1.5 million tons, in the amount of emissions came from electricity, gas and water supply sector, and then it fluctuated at around 1.2 million tons until 2001, before declining to 0.5 million tons at the end of the period shown.
Moreover, the amount of acid rain emissions in the UK by other industries, remaining the same over the next 3 years; however, it decreased to 1.2 million tons in 2007. The figure for acid rain gases from transport and communities sector remained almost unchanged during the period shown. Finally, there was a small decrease, from 0.6 to 0.5 million tons in 2007, in the amount of acid rain emissions came from the domestic sector.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ricity, gas and water supply sector. In 1991, around 3.4 million tons of acid r...
^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...om 1993 to 2001, this country underwent a much decline, at only under 1.5 million tons...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, then, while, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80081300813 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49379227962 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422764227642 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.025876734 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.222222222 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267360852321 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154299728518 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494555557771 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209638702361 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322605939859 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.